Cultural Adaptation Of The Oxford Digital Multiple Errands Test (OxMET) For An English Speaking North American Population
Sam S. Webb1, Suzanne Perea Burns2, Anders Jespersen3, Nele Demeyere1
1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, 2University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 3Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh
INTRODUCTION
Executive function refers to higher-level mental abilities which enable an individual to adapt to novel situations, shift between tasks, and inhibit preponent behaviours in order to reach a goal [2]. Sometimes individuals with acquired brain injury may perform well on highly structured abstract tasks but may have impairments in everyday life [3]. The Multiple Errands Test (MET) was created to identify impairments in everyday behaviour which are missed on highly structured assessment of executive function [3]. The MET uses a shopping scenario with rules, multiple tasks, and constraints on time or resources. Various versions exist of the MET, including home-based assessments [4], hospital versions [5,6], and generic/adaptable versions [7]. The Oxford Digital Multiple Errands Test (OxMET; [1]) is a computer-tablet based, aphasia friendly, 5-minute assessment that uses a British shopping street scenario to assess executive functioning [1]. It requires participants to buy 6 items and answer two questions with constraints on number of visits to shops, time used, and money spent. The test was standardised and normed in a United Kingdom based sample of 124 healthy adults and was subsequently validated in a clinical sample of stroke survivors [1]. Our objective was to detail the North American cultural adaptation of the OxMET.
METHODS
Six occupational therapy students (OTs) and as well as a highly experienced expert (author SB) reviewed the OxMET task, each completing a standardised cultural adaptation document (see doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2QJ9H for the document). After identification of items and shops which required adaptation from for a North American sample, the illustrator on the OxMET team (author AJ) redesigned the stimuli and these were checked by authors SB and SW. An iterative approach to stimuli design was used, with author SB checking stimuli and assessing suitability and requesting changes, this led to further stimuli refinement. In addition, following completion of the OxMET stimuli adaptation, 5 occupational therapists completed the Suitability Assessment of Materials for evaluation of health-related information for adults (SAM) questionnaire [8] to assess the finalised cultural adaptation; specifically, sections regarding literacy demand (sentence construction and vocabulary) and cultural adaptation (all sub sections). Figure 1 shows the original OxMET shopping street and example of stimuli.
RESULTS
Stimuli changes
Stimuli were integrated and adapted into the OxMET-USA. Changes are detailed in Table 1.
Original stimuli in OxMET |
Adapted stimuli in OxMET-USA |
Shopping list item: 'Wellies' | 'Rain boots' |
Shop name/type: 'Shop' | 'Store' |
Shop name/type: 'Post Office' | 'U.S. Postal Service' |
Shop name/type: 'Green Grocer' | 'Farmers Market' |
Shop name/type: 'Butchers' shop' | 'Meat Market' |
Shop name/type: 'Fish n Chips' | 'Burgers' |
Currency: '£' | '$' |
Item in shop: 1st and 2nd class stamps | Forever stamps, and post-card stamps |
Item in shop: 'malt vinegar' | 'ketchup' |
Item in shop: 'seed tape' | 'seed packet' |
Figure 2 shows the new OxMET-USA design and exemplar stimuli with currency and style changes.
SAM questionnaire
Findings on the SAM questionnaire revealed that 3 of the 5 students considered the sentence construction to be of superior quality, with 2 considering it adequate. All OTs reported the vocabulary in the adapted version to be of superior quality. Four OTs considered the cultural match and cultural imagery of the updated stimuli to be of superior quality and 1 considered them adequate. On a scale of 0 (Definitely not recommended) to 10 (Recommended without reservation), 2 OTs scored the updated OxMET 10, 2 scored 9 and the final OT scored the updated OxMET 8.
DISCUSSION
We aimed to detail the adaptation of the psychometrically validated Oxford Digital Multiple Errands Test (OxMET) for a North American population. Occupational therapists, those most likely to adopt and use the OxMET tool, first assessed the OxMET for changes regarding stimuli to reflect North American culture. This resulted in adapted stimuli and names of items and shops more commonly used in the USA. When the OxMET was adapted, the occupational therapists then reviewed the finalised version and rated it for cultural relevance using the SAM questionnaire, which revealed adequate-superior quality of our adaptation.
CONCLUSION
The North American cultural adaptation of the OxMET was completed with new shopping street design and stimuli which keeps the same style and placement of items and shops to enable lower confounds between cultural versions. Future research will include normative data collection and validation of the OxMET-USA. Once normed and validated we envisage the OxMET-USA as a useful tool for assessing executive functioning in clinical populations.
REFERENCES
- Webb SS, Anders J, Chiu EG, Payne F, Basting R, Duta MD, et al. The Oxford Digital Multiple Errands Test (OxMET): Validation of a Simplified Computer Tablet Based Multiple Errands Test. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021;
- Goldstein S, Naglieri JA, Princiotta D, Otero TM. Introduction: A history of executive functioning as a theoretical and clinical construct. In: Handbook of executive functioning. Springer; 2014. p. 3–12.
- Shallice T, Burgess P. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain J Neurol. 1991;114(2):727–41.
- Burns SP, Dawson DR, Perea JD, Vas A, Pickens ND, Neville M. Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Multiple Errands Test Home Version (MET–Home) in Adults With Stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2019;73(3):7303205030p1–10.
- Alderman N, Burgess PW, Knight C, Henman C. Ecological validity of a simplified version of the multiple errands shopping test. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003;9(1):31–44.
- Knight C, Alderman N, Burgess PW. Development of a simplified version of the multiple errands test for use in hospital settings. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2002;12(3):231–55.
- Basagni B, Bosetti S, Cantelli S, Ermon S, Rovere F, Navarrete E, et al. Development of a generic version of the multiple errands test for severe acquired brain injuries. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Oct 18;0(0):1–8.
- Doak C, Doak L, Root J. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills [Book]. second. J. B. Lippincott Company; 1996. Available from: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/healthliteracy/resources/teaching-patients-with-low-literacy-skills/